NFL Football Team Ratings
Performance vs. Expectation (PvE) rating leaderboard for the 2026 season.
32 Teams Rated
| Rank | Team | RW | OW | T | OL | RL | Rating | Rank Î | Rating Î | OffRt | DefRt | SoS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Buffalo Bills | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 73.81 | â | -1.11 | +12.46 | -2.13 | -5.95 |
| #2 | Minnesota Vikings | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 70.51 | â | -0.09 | -6.36 | +11.55 | -1.49 |
| #3 | Chicago Bears | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 70.44 | â | +0.07 | +5.03 | +1.00 | +3.65 |
| #4 | San Francisco 49ers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 70.27 | â | +0.10 | +6.55 | +4.29 | -6.01 |
| #5 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 67.97 | Ⲡ+2 | +12.08 | +6.11 | +8.83 | +0.13 |
| #6 | Denver Broncos | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 67.66 | âŧ -1 | +0.84 | +1.14 | +5.98 | +12.91 |
| #7 | New England Patriots | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 59.72 | âŧ -1 | +0.51 | +2.91 | +8.87 | +15.92 |
| #8 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 48.44 | â | -0.17 | -0.72 | +4.35 | +1.07 |
| #9 | Detroit Lions | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 47.01 | â | -0.05 | +7.79 | -2.04 | +1.18 |
| #10 | Cincinnati Bengals | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 34.12 | â | -0.64 | +9.10 | -3.62 | -12.61 |
| #11 | Green Bay Packers | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 32.13 | â | -0.04 | -0.87 | +5.71 | +7.30 |
| #12 | Seattle Seahawks | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 25.80 | â | +0.14 | +3.33 | +7.95 | +16.06 |
| #13 | Kansas City Chiefs | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23.89 | â | +0.15 | +1.29 | +6.88 | -9.42 |
| #14 | Los Angeles Rams | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10.44 | Ⲡ+1 | +0.12 | +1.44 | +3.65 | -2.84 |
| #15 | Cleveland Browns | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10.11 | âŧ -1 | -0.60 | -6.80 | +1.32 | -6.21 |
| #16 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -0.82 | â | -0.13 | -0.49 | +2.98 | +17.00 |
| #17 | Atlanta Falcons | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -4.72 | â | -0.76 | -1.00 | -0.04 | +16.24 |
| #18 | Carolina Panthers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -17.24 | â | +0.05 | -1.17 | -7.51 | +12.36 |
| #19 | New York Giants | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -17.32 | â | -0.02 | -4.37 | -4.19 | -38.34 |
| #20 | Houston Texans | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -17.61 | â | +1.02 | +0.61 | +6.92 | -4.65 |
| #21 | Baltimore Ravens | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -29.30 | â | -10.41 | -1.83 | -1.85 | -5.98 |
| #22 | Las Vegas Raiders | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -30.50 | â | -0.09 | +0.80 | -10.04 | -10.76 |
| #23 | Dallas Cowboys | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -37.40 | â | -0.59 | +4.79 | -10.53 | -22.83 |
| #24 | Arizona Cardinals | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -37.57 | â | +0.08 | -2.59 | -10.43 | +10.63 |
| #25 | New Orleans Saints | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -43.97 | â | -1.34 | -2.81 | -5.40 | +12.02 |
| #26 | Washington Commanders | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -44.49 | â | +0.16 | -1.50 | -6.51 | -21.42 |
| #27 | Indianapolis Colts | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | -55.99 | â | +0.17 | +0.59 | -7.08 | +2.71 |
| #28 | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | -59.20 | â | +0.05 | -4.86 | -2.65 | +22.66 |
| #29 | Philadelphia Eagles | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | -67.66 | â | +0.95 | -5.88 | +2.50 | -11.57 |
| #30 | New York Jets | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | -69.40 | â | -0.01 | -3.44 | -4.48 | +3.99 |
| #31 | Los Angeles Chargers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | -81.41 | â | +0.08 | -10.02 | +1.45 | +19.08 |
| #32 | Tennessee Titans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | -97.76 | â | -0.52 | -8.95 | -7.94 | -26.63 |
âšī¸ Standings & Rating System Legend
RW
Regulation Win
Standard victory secured within regulation play.
OW
Overtime Win
Victory secured in overtime (includes Shootout Win in the NHL and Extra-Inning decisions in MLB).
T
Tie Game
Contest drawn after full regulation and overtime.
OL
Overtime Loss
Contest tied at end of regulation; lost in overtime (includes Shootout Loss in the NHL and Extra-Inning decisions in MLB).
RL
Regulation Loss
Defeat in standard regulation play.
PvE Rating
Performance vs. Expectation
Zero-centered Elo power rating measuring opponent-adjusted performance against Vegas closing expectations.
Rank Î / Rating Î
Rating & Rank Momentum
Net movement in leaderboard rank and raw rating compared to the previous rating calculation date.
Off / Def / SoS
Offense, Defense & Strength of Sched
Component offensive and defensive power ratings, plus average opponent rating faced to date.